Guest: John Hunt; Topics: An in-depth look at the recent government UAP Task Force Report re Navy Tic Tac sightings from 2004-2021, related topics of interest, fringe topics, conspiracy topics, ET, government coverup, alternative UAP explanations.
Please direct all comments and questions regarding specific Space Show programs & guest(s) to the Space Show blog which is part of archived program on our website, www.thespaceshow.com. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.
We welcomed back John Hunt, a frequent guest and caller to The Space Show on the Tic Tac topic, SLS, issues relating to physics and the hard sciences, policy, national security and more. Today John was with us to examine the recently released non-classified report to the Senate on the string of Navy sightings from 2005-2021 and ongoing referred to as Tic Tac. While John believes they are likely not from here, and by the fact that John does know very well the UFO story and history dating back decades in time, some listeners have referred to our guest as a true believer as if that disqualifies his opinions and analysis. While I also said that John is a true believer, I know he does first rate and objective analysis which is why I turned to him to delved into the UAP Tic Tac report. John really is not a true believer because of his willingness and objectivity in doing research. By the way, I was disappointed in the government report. I know full well that when the report came out, others suggested it was very revealing and was important because the government was being forced to deal with the issue and admitting there was probably more to come out or be released. In fact, in their summary, more study and of course more funding was called for as if there would ever be a government report saying they had enough money. Such a government statement like that would probably cause another report into those making the claim that they had enough money.
As to this show, I realize it is a wild and crazy topic, often drifts to the wild and wacky fringe and truly crazy. I know that it irritates many listeners who believe they absolutely know what the Tic Tac is or was because they send me emails telling me. One listener posted such an email on the blog for this show. The problem with all these "experts" on Tic Tac is that as of yet, not one of these experts has provided any credentials to make me or the reader of their notes and posts believe they have the expertise to speak to the nature of Tic Tac. While everyone can have an opinions, should have an opinion and all of those opinions are welcome on TSS, for credibility I would think the person sending me the note or posting on the blog would state their credentials or why we should trust THEIR analysis of Tic Tac over what was released to the Senate or over what noted by very credible UAP researchers. I could make a list of such scholars and researchers but this is supposed to be a summary of this program. That said, I am going to extra lengths to let listeners know that I am fully aware the topic is controversial, that many believe THEY know the truth of Tic Tac, either as a government secret or just a blurry balloon picture or that many of you believe it is all a hoax and TSS should not be giving it the time of day. Still, I believe it was important to cover the report to the Senate and John was an excellent choice to lead the discussion. Any of you could have listened, called in, sent a comment or two before the show and of course blog posts are still welcome. All your comments are welcome, just be civil, respectful and use decent language but hey, let us know your opinions on the matter. I've stated my opinions since the start and I really want their to be ETs out there that we can connect with but to me, I see dark military objects being tested against our best military. I see advance radar spoofing and maybe even some sort of advanced imaging with mass. Of all the emails I have received telling me exactly what they are, I don't find credibility in any of those but again, if you know what Tic Tac is and what to tell us, tell us why you know and why we should believe in your analysis.
For today's program, John made a great summary of the UAP Task Force Report. It is the first blog post on our blog for this page. Our program pretty much followed the order of topics per John's summary report so you might have it opened and follow along with us. Also, note the tags and key words as they provide a good summary of all the topics and even the straying off the topic topics that we talked about on the show. For your convenience, here are the tags for this show:
Tags: John Hunt, UAP Task Force Report, Tic Tac, Navy incidents, U.S. Air Force, incident timelines, study summary, UAP Caveats, Report UAP classifications, study report challenges, study report recommendations, physical objects, radar spoofing, multiple Navy video, one balloon identified, UAP/UFO coverup by government, Roswell, testing Navy pilots and sensors, national security concerns, space fence detection, animal mutilation, video debunking, alternative identifications for Tic Tac objects, conspiracy theories, wrong sensors for objects, Admiral Wilson story, incidents confirming physical objects/mass, satellite imagery, metamaterials, Dr. Hal Puthoff, Bob Bigelow, ET or not?
Some of the narrative of the program plus several calls and emails grabbed my attention. For example, according to the number of items examined by the report I found the breakdown and conclusions to be of great interest. To understand why, listen to the dialog on this item. I also thought the conclusions of the report were interesting in that there were safety issues and concerns and maybe a threat to national security. For those of you who write or post that you know what the UAP items are, tell us why the government would make these claims and warnings. I also found the discussions about government telling the truth, engaging in a coverup and related topics to be of interest. What do you think about this? Let us know by posting on the blog. I think you know where I stand on our government being transparent and honest with us across the board.
Of special interest were the numerous comments by listener Adrian in San Diego. I read all of his emails on air and John addressed his comments and questions. Adrian sent us an article which we discussed which you can read and download here regarding Stanford metamaterials: https://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/may/meta-material-invisible-050613.html. Again, for details, listen to the discussion. I also listened with great interest to our guest telling us the story of Admiral Wilson. Don't miss it. Fremont John called wanting to know about the incidents with physical objects- mass. We had quite the go around on that topic so don't miss it. As the program was about to end, John was asked about rumors of UAP/UFO materials or metamaterials having been studied by Dr. Puthoff and/or Bob Bigelow. John then proceeded to offer us a short summary of the program.
Please post your comments and questions on the blog. All of your comments are welcome regardless of your opinion of our discussion, the government UAP report or the Navy Tic Tac videos. We want to hear from you. You can reach John Hunt through me or your blog posts. If you want me to forward a note to John, just let me know.
The Space Show
